Postgres OnLine Journal - hstore

Mail Merging using Hstore

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:25:00 -0500

For those who aren't familiar with hstore, it's a key/value storage type that is packaged as an extension or contrib in PostgreSQL 8.2+. In PostgreSQL 9.0 it got a little extra loving in several ways one of which was the introduction of the hstore(record) casting function that converts a record to an hstore. In this article, I'll demonstrate how you can use this new casting function to do very sleek mail merges right in the database. The only caveat is that it seems to only correctly name the keys if it is fed a real table or view. Derived queries such as aggregates etc get keys named f1, f2, etc.

If you are on PostgreSQL 9.1 or above installing -- hstore is just a CREATE EXTENSION hstore; sql command away. If you are on a lower version of PostgreSQL, you can usually find the hstore.sql in share/contribs.

Continue reading "Mail Merging using Hstore"

Improving speed of GIST indexes in PostgreSQL 9.2

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:24:00 -0400

This is about improvements to GIST indexes that I hope to see in PostgreSQL 9.2. One is a patch for possible inclusion in PostgreSQL 9.2 called SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST created by Teodor Sigaev and Oleg Bartunov whose basic technique is described in SP-GiST: An Extensible Database Index for Supporting Space Partitioning Trees. For those who don't know Teodor and Oleg, they are the great fellows that brought us many other GiST and GIN goodnesses that many specialty PostgreSQL extensions enjoy -- e.g. PostGIS, trigrams, ltree, pgsphere, hstore, full-text search to name a few.

Another is a recent one just committed by Alexander Korotkov which I just recently found out about on New node splitting algorithm for GIST and admit I don't know enough about to judge. I have to admit to being very clueless when it comes to the innards of index implementations so don't ask me any technical details. It's one of those short-comings among the trillion others I have that I have learned to accept will probably never change.

What the SP-GIST patch will provide in terms of performance and speed was outlined in PGCon 2011: SP-GiST - a new indexing infrastructure for PostgreSQL Space-Partitioning trees in PostgreSQL.

What it provides specifically for PostGIS is summarized in Paul's call for action noted below. As a passionate user of PostGIS ,ltree, tsearch, and hstore, I'm pretty excited about these patches and other GIST and general index enhancements and there potential use in GIST dependent extensions. I'm hoping to see these spring to life in PostgreSQL 9.2 and think it will help to further push the envelope of where PostgreSQL can go as a defacto platform for cutting-edge technology and scientific research. I think one of PostgreSQL's greatest strength is its extensible index API.

Paul's PostGIS newsgroup note about seeking funding for faster GIST indexes , work done so far on SP-GIST and call for further action is rebroadcast in it's entirety here.

Thanks to the sponsorship of Michigan Technological University, we now
have 50% of the work complete. There is a working patch at the
commitfest https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=631
which provides quad-tree and kd-tree indexes.

However, there is a problem: unless the patch is reviewed and goes
through more QA/QC, it'll never get into PostgreSQL proper. In case
you think I am kidding: we had a patch for KNN searching ready for the
9.0 release, but it wasn't reviewed in time, so we had to wait all the
way through the 9.1 cycle to get it.

I am looking for sponsors in the $5K to $10K range to complete this
work. If you use PostgreSQL in your business, this is a chance to add
a basic capability that may help you in all kinds of ways you don't
expect. We're talking about faster geospatial indexes here, but this
facility will also radically speed any partitioned space. (For
example, the suffix-tree, which can search through URLs incredibly
fast. Another example, you can use a suffix tree to very efficiently
index geohash strings. Interesting.)

If you think there's a possibility, please contact me and I will send
you a prospectus you can take to your manager. Let's make this happen
folks!

Paul

Continue reading "Improving speed of GIST indexes in PostgreSQL 9.2"

Explain Plans PostgreSQL 9.0 Text, JSON, XML, YAML - Part 1: You Choose

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:58:03 -0400

One of the new features of PostgreSQL 9.0 is the ability to specify the format of an explain plan. In prior versions your only choice was text (and graphic explain with tools like PgAdmin III and other GUIS), but in 9.0 on, you have the additional options of Javascript Object Notation (JSON) which some people have a thing or two to say about them, YAML Ain't Markup Language (YAML) or eXtended Markup Language (XML). The new explain options are itemized in PostgreSQL 9.0 EXPLAIN.

The main benefit of the JSON, XML, YAML formats is that they are easier to machine parse than the default text version. This will allow for creative renderings of planner trees with minimal coding.

In Part 1 of this series, we'll demonstrate how to output the plans in these various formats and what they look like. In later parts of this series -- we'll demonstrate how to use Javascript, XSL and other scripting/markup languages to transform these into works of art you can hang on your wall.

-- START POSTGIS IN ACTION ASIDE --

We just submitted the third major revision of Chapter 3 Data Modeling of our upcoming PostGIS in Action book. The second major revision we never submitted and threw it out because it wasn't worldly enough and was too involved. We may use it later on for an example. Chapter 3 should be up on Manning Early Access Program (MEAP) soon. If you haven't bought the book yet Buy now. You don't want to miss out on a major masterpiece in the making. Okay we exaggerate a bit.

-- END POSTGIS IN ACTION ASIDE --
Continue reading "Explain Plans PostgreSQL 9.0 Text, JSON, XML, YAML - Part 1: You Choose"