Postgres OnLine Journal - postgresql versions

KNN GIST with a Lateral twist: Coming soon to a database near you

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Tue, 21 May 2013 20:35:00 -0400

One of the things that really frustrated me about the KNN GIST distance box box centroid operators that came in PostgreSQL 9.1 and PostGIS 2.0 was the fact that one of the elements needed to be constant to take advantage of the index. In PostGIS speak, this meant you couldn't put it in the FROM clause and could only enjoy it in one of two ways.

Continue reading "KNN GIST with a Lateral twist: Coming soon to a database near you"

PostgreSQL 9.3 extension treats for windows users: plV8

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Mon, 13 May 2013 15:09:00 -0400

Now that PostgreSQL 9.3 beta1 has been released we've started to jump start our experimentation by compiling our favorite extensions. First on the list is PL/V8 js.

This was compiled against 9.3beta1 for 64-bit and 32-bit and plv8 version 1.4.0. We briefly tried with the EDB windows builds which we downloaded from: http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgbindownload and seems to work fine.

We hope windows users find these useful.

PostGIS 2.1.0 beta2 is out and windows binaries available

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Sun, 12 May 2013 18:38:00 -0400

PostGIS 2.1.0 beta2 is out. Details on what's new in it are in official news release: http://postgis.net/2013/05/11/postgis-2-1-0beta2. This is the first version of PostGIS to work with PostgreSQL 9.3, so if you are planning to experiment with PostgreSQL 9.3 coming out soon, use this one. Also check out the documentation in new ePUB offering format if you have an ereader and let us know how it looks. It seems to vary alot depending on what ePub reader used.

For windows users, we've got binary builds available compiled against PostgreSQL 9.3beta1 (and also available for 9.2 9x32,64) and 9.0,9.1 (x64). Details on windows PostGIS downloads page: http://postgis.net/windows_downloads. It does not yet have the new Advanced 3D offering (provided by SFCGAL https://github.com/Oslandia/SFCGAL), but we hope to have that compiled and packaged with the binaries before release time.

Which PostGIS should you use with PostgreSQL 9.3

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:30:00 -0400

PostgreSQL 9.3 will be coming out in beta soon and with that, some who want to experiment with both PostGIS and PostgreSQL 9.3 have asked if they can use PostGIS 2.0. The answer is NO. A lot of major changes happened in PostgreSQL 9.3 that required us to patch up upcoming PostGIS 2.1. These changes were not backported to 2.0 and I personally do not plan to back-port them unless lightning strikes me and I escape unscathed, a big wad of cash falls from the sky, or for some reason we can't make the 2.1 cut before 9.3 comes out. So if you are planning to experiment with PostgreSQL 9.3, PLEASE use PostGIS 2.1 development branch. I will try to make sure we release 2.1 before PostgreSQL 9.3 comes out even if I have to resort to hitting some people over the head with a rubber bat :).

If ever in doubt what versions of PostGIS works with what versions of PostgreSQL /GEOS / GDAL, please refer to the matrix that we try to keep up to date. http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/UsersWikiPostgreSQLPostGIS.

Now some people might say "Isn't it cruel not to support PostGIS 2.0 for 9.3", and my answer is "it's crueler to". The reason is simple. We have limited bandwidth for testing permutations of things and the more permutations of things we support, the dirtier our code base becomes making it harder to maintain and also the less time we can devote to properly testing each permutation. I'd rather say we don't support something than to do a half-hearted job of supporting all. On a slightly different, but also pragmatic note, package maintainers (except for windows maintainers :)) generally only carry one version of PostGIS per version of PostgreSQL, and I'd rather users getting from packages see our best foot than a two year old aging foot.

Note: that going from PostGIS 2.0 to 2.1 is a soft upgrade so you can install 2.1 on your existing PostgreSQL 9.2 without dump restore and then you should be able to pg_upgrade over to 9.3 if your database is too big to dump restore.

pgRouting windows binaries for PostgreSQL 9.2 32-bit and 64-bit

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:26:00 -0400

We've got experimental pgRouting windows binaries available for windows PostgreSQL 9.2 32-bit and 64-bit for pgRouting 1.0.7 development branch. More details on our Boston GIS blog page.

The final versions we plan to release with upcoming PostGIS 2.1 PostgreSQL 9.2 on stackbuilder as part of the PostGIS install. Barring no difficulties we'll also have experimental binaries for PostgreSQL 9.3 releases once 9.3 reaches beta.

This version and upcoming pgRouting versions support the PostgreSQL extension model, so if you have postgis already installed, its just an additonal simple step:

CREATE EXTENSION pgrouting;

PostGIS In Action 2nd Edition MEAP 3 Update

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:06:00 -0400

The 3rd MEAP update of PostGIS In Action, 2nd Edition will be going out very shortly to Early Action purchasers. Keep your eyes peeled. Lots of errata corrections in previous chapters and appendix, and one very VERY new chapter on Raster functions which took a ton of time to write, so hopefully it will be well received. Our progress on the chapters is listed on PostGIS In Action 2nd Edition Chapters and all the ones marked as completed you will find in the MEAP. The ones with paperclips have downloadable code and data which you can click on the paperclip to download.

Regarding Raster, the Raster Function chapter is just merely the tip. You'll see a lot more raster usage in upcoming Relating two or more spatial objects and Raster Processing chapter which we are still fleshing out.

We are immensely grateful to all the early action subscribers who have posted errata or general comments about what can be clarified or examples that don't work. General comments about what specific kinds of examples you'd like to see are also welcome. Your opinions really influence what we write and make for a better book.

Continue reading "PostGIS In Action 2nd Edition MEAP 3 Update"

PostOS

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 02:24:53 -0400

Forget Linux, Forget Unix, Forget MacWhatever, forget Windows, and any other OS you may be using. Say hello to PostOS. PostOS is built on PostgreSQL technology and fits you like a glove.

The built-in planner watches you type (or stare in confusion) and creates a composite image of what kind of person you are and what behavior it should emulate. It's integrated monitor display and speakers are used to provide information as well as to watch and hear your every move. The built-in image recognition system (an extension to the PostGIS extension), can distinguish between members of your family and can impersonate them as well and change behavior accordingly.

Continue reading "PostOS"

PostGIS 2.0.3 for Windows x32 and x64 installers

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 01:48:00 -0400

We have all the setup executables for PostgreSQL 8.4-9.2 32-bit and PostgreSQL 9.1-9.2 x64-bit for PostGIS 2.0.3. We'll have the 9.0x64-bit ones up shortly but do have the binaries.

We are planning to release these to stackbuilder sometime next week, but would like some feedback first with any issues people run into.

One person already reported a serious bug in our original packaging which we fixed. If you already installed 2.0.3 the x64-bit version or any of the 9.2 versions (both x32 and x64) that was not marked as -2.zip, -2.exe, you'll want to reinstall. The 8.4-9.1 32-bits were not affected so just have a -1.

Packages can be downloaded from:
http://download.osgeo.org/postgis/windows

General details on what is included:

http://postgis.net/windows_downloads

As always if you are installing for PostgreSQL x64 make sure to pick a zip or installer with 64 in the name. The unmarked or marked with 32 are just for PostgreSQL 32-bit.

Should I install using PostGIS extension

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:37:00 -0500

Should I install using PostGIS extension? is an FAQ that comes up quite a bit in PostGIS circles and unfortunately askers get mixed answers. In How to upgrade your database to PostGIS 2.0 we covered WHY you should use extensions. In this article I'll use my Lincoln-Douglas debate skills to argue why you shouldn't. Keep in mind that I put a great deal of effort in fitting PostGIS extensions into the existing PostGIS build structure and I eat my own dogfood, so I might be a little biased and a poor defender of the counter argument.

Continue reading "Should I install using PostGIS extension"

PostgreSQL 9.3 postgres_fdw: a Test Drive

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:12:00 -0500

Just recently saw Michael Paguier's article on the recent commit of postgres_fdw so I was excited to try this out for myself. Questions we wanted to answer/experience were:

Can I connect against different versions of PostgreSQL? Yes to test I tried connecting from my PostgreSQL 9.3 dev instance to my 9.2 instance on another box.
Can I use a foreign type like -- you guessed it PostGIS if we have same version of PostGIS installed on both databases? Yes. I didn't try with different versions so not sure if that would work especially since the structure changed a bit between 1.5 and 2.0. I suspect 2.0 and 2.1 would work fine and might be a good way to cheat run 2.1 on 9.3 but creating derivatives of my 2.0 data with functions only available in 2.1.
Will it use my spatial index? No or at least we couldn't figure out how and I don't see how it is possible, but would be nice if it could be
Can I have a table defined with dynamic SQL? Nope or at least the docs don't mention it. This is a feature I really liked about the ODBC_FDW because often times I want the table to be filtered especially if I need my filter to use an expensive index like a spatial one or utilize functions only available on the foreign server. If that were part of the definition of the foreign table, then it could in theory process that part on the foreign server. So this makes postgres_fdw not a good replacement for dblink in many cases.

So here are the tests we did to experiment with:

Continue reading "PostgreSQL 9.3 postgres_fdw: a Test Drive"

PostgreSQL 9.2 windows binaries for file_textarray_fdw

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 14:06:00 -0500

We discussed a while back the Text array foreign data wrapper that allows you to register and query a delimited file as if it were a regular table with one array column. It's probably the FDW we use most often and reminded of that recently when I had to query a 500,000 record resident list tab delimited file to prep for geocoding.

When we upgraded to 9.2 and we could no longer compile, I wrote to Andrew Dunstan about this and he kindly created a 9.2 version. Unfortunately there are still quite a few FDWs broken as a result of the 9.2 changes and I was hoping to try to apply similar patches to them that I saw Andrew do, but haven't had the patience or time yet. Anyway we've compiled these for 9.2 under our mingw64-w64 and mingw64-w32 chains using Andrew's 9.2 GitHub stable branch. https://github.com/adunstan/file_text_array_fdw/tree/REL9_2_STABLE and we've tested them using the PostgreSQL EDB windows VC++ compiled versions. We hope you find them as useful as we have.

I'm hoping to add more FDWs to these 9.2 bags once we have those working again. If you want to compile yourself or compile others, we have instructions in the packaged README.txt.

PostgreSQL 9.3 Lateral Part2: The Lateral Left Join

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:35:00 -0500

In the last article we said you can't have a LEFT JOIN with LATERAL. Turns out we were mistaken and YES indeed you can and when you do it is equivalent or more powerful than SQL Server's OUTER APPLY.

Let us say that in our query we wanted all my zips returned but for ones that had keys where the value is in a certain range, we want those keys returned. we'd do this. The fact we need all even if they have no such keys necessitates us putting the condition in the ON rather than the WHERE.

SELECT zip, (h).key, (h).value As val
 FROM zcta5 AS foo 
   LEFT JOIN LATERAL each(hstore(foo) - 'zip'::text)  As h 
    ON ((h).value BETWEEN '12345' and '14567')
    ORDER BY zip
   limit 5;

Output would be

 zip  |  key   |   val
------+--------+----------
00601 |        |
00602 |        |
00603 |        |
00606 | awater | 12487.00
00610 | hu10   | 12618

PostgreSQL 9.3 Lateral Part 1: Use with HStore

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Sun, 06 Jan 2013 07:00:00 -0500

One of the improvements coming in PostgreSQL 9.3 is the new LATERAL SQL clause. LATERAL allows you to write more succinct code than you would be able to otherwise and will be a welcome companion to extensions like hstore and PostGIS which both have a plethora of set returning functions. In this article, I'll just demonstrate it's use with hstore and subsequent I'll talk about it's potential use in PostGIS raster,geometry, and topology for exploding subelements.

One thing I was very interested in aside from the succinctness is whether it will be more performant than the older approach. A perfect test case for hstore would be the example we just demonstrated in Unpivoting data in PostgreSQL. For this example, we'll rewrite the hstore view using LATERAL instead of employing a subselect.

Continue reading "PostgreSQL 9.3 Lateral Part 1: Use with HStore"

Unpivoting data in PostgreSQL

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:03:00 -0500

A while ago we demonstrated how to create cross tabulation tables using tablefunc extension aka (Pivot Tables) (basically collapsing rows into columns). Recently someone asked me how to do the reverse (convert columns to rows). He found a solution to the problem here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1128737/unpivot-and-postgresql using a combination of array and unnest. That approach is very similar to SQL Server's built-in Pivot SQL predicate. The solution seemed nice enough except similar to the SQL Server Unpivot, it required knowing the column names beforehand so very hard to genericize. So would it be possible to accomplish this feat without knowing the columns names (except for the key) and be able to do it with one SQL statement. I realized that the PostgreSQL hstore extension fit the bill nicely. In this article I'll demonstrate both approaches by creating a view using both.

Continue reading "Unpivoting data in PostgreSQL"

Unknown object type 84 in default privileges

nospam@example.com (Leo Hsu and Regina Obe) — Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:08:00 -0500

We recently started upgrading some of our databases on windows 64-bit to 9.2, in doing so we ran into a nasty issue we discovered when some of our backups were failing. The first time it happened, I chucked it up to a dirty PostgreSQL 8.4 database being restored to PostgreSQL 9.2.1. The second time it happened restoring a 9.1 database to 9.2.2, I thought, better look into this to see if there is a known issue. Low and behold I found this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2012-12/msg00091.php (Bug #7741). Apparently something to do with granting rights on Types.

As a workaround for this problem so our backups would work again was to delete the offending permissions from system tables. It's probably not the best way but only way we could think of, we delete the bad record in pg_default_acl and after that backup works without complaint.

   -- there is no such thing as T for default priviledges that pg_dump understands based on 
-- https://github.com/adunstan/postgresql-dev/blob/master/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c#L11838
-- backup bad records just in case we need them again --
SELECT * into zz_bad_pg_default_acl FROM pg_default_acl  WHERE defaclobjtype = 'T'; 
-- delete unknown records --
DELETE from pg_default_acl WHERE defaclobjtype = 'T';

If anyone else has further input on this, I'd be interested.