Every once in a while, especially if you have a fairly large database, you may find the need to do select backups of certain tables.
Your criteria might be based on name or how relatively recently data has changed in the table.
Below are some of the tricks we use. Some use our favorite hack of scripting command line scripts with SQL.
UPDATE: Thanks all for the suggestions. For now we ended up increasing the
seq_page_cost from 1 to 2 in the database. That has gotten us back to our old much much faster speeds without change in code and seems to have
improved the speeds of other queries as well, without reducing speed of any.
ALTER DATABASE mydb SET seq_page_cost=2;
As Jeff suggested, we'll try to come up with a standalone example that exhibits the behavior. The below example was more to demonstrate the construct. Table names and fields were changed to protect the innocent so that is why we didn't bother showing explain plans. The behavior also seems to do
with the distribution of data and gets worse when stats are updated (via vacuum analyze). Didn't see this in PostgreSQL 8.3 and this was a system recently upgraded from 8.3 to 8.4
---ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE --
This is a very odd thing and I think has happened to us perhaps once before.
Its a bit puzzling, and we aren't particularly happy with our work around because its
something that looks to a casual observer as a bit bizarre. The hack is setting the enable_seqscan setting
off for a particular query to force the planner to use indexes available to it.
What is particularly troubling about this problem, is that it wasn't always this way.
This is a piece of query code we've had in an application for a while, and its worked shall
I say really fast. Response times in 300 ms - 1 sec, for what is not a trivial query against a not
so trivially sized hierarchy of tables.
Anyrate, one day -- this query that we were very happy with, suddenly started
hanging taking 5 minutes to run. Sure data had been added and so forth, but that didn't
completely explain this sudden change of behavior. The plan it had taken had changed drastically.
It just suddenly decided to stop using a critical index it had always used. Well it was still using it but just on
the root table, not the children. Though querying a child directly proved that it still refused to use it,
so it didn't seem to be the hierarchy at fault here.